0.09
Impact Factor
0.05
5-Years IF
1
5-Years H index
0.09
Impact Factor
0.05
5-Years IF
1
5-Years H index
IF | AIF | IF5 | DOC | CDO | CCU | CIF | CIT | D2Y | C2Y | D5Y | C5Y | %SC | CiY | II | AII | |
1990 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.06 | ||||||||||
1991 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.04 | ||||||||||
1992 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1993 | 0.13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.06 | ||||||||||
1994 | 0.14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.06 | ||||||||||
1995 | 0.17 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.11 | |||||||||
1996 | 0.22 | 6 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 (100%) | 0.1 | ||||||||
1997 | 0.22 | 4 | 15 | 1 | 11 | 11 | 1 (100%) | 0.09 | ||||||||
1998 | 0.24 | 2 | 17 | 10 | 15 | (%) | 0.13 | |||||||||
1999 | 0.3 | 10 | 27 | 2 | 6 | 17 | 1 (50%) | 0.16 | ||||||||
2000 | 0.37 | 0.04 | 6 | 33 | 1 | 0.03 | 12 | 27 | 1 | (%) | 0.14 | |||||
2001 | 0.37 | 7 | 40 | 2 | 16 | 28 | 1 (50%) | 0.17 | ||||||||
2002 | 0.08 | 0.37 | 0.03 | 6 | 46 | 1 | 0.02 | 1 | 13 | 1 | 29 | 1 | 1 (100%) | 0.18 | ||
2003 | 0.4 | 6 | 52 | 13 | 31 | (%) | 0.19 | |||||||||
2004 | 0.41 | 9 | 61 | 1 | 12 | 35 | (%) | 0.18 | ||||||||
2005 | 0.43 | 0.03 | 2 | 63 | 1 | 0.02 | 15 | 34 | 1 | (%) | 0.21 | |||||
2006 | 0.44 | 7 | 70 | 11 | 30 | (%) | 0.19 | |||||||||
2007 | 0.37 | 2 | 72 | 9 | 30 | (%) | 0.17 | |||||||||
2008 | 0.39 | 5 | 77 | 9 | 26 | (%) | 0.17 | |||||||||
2009 | 0.36 | 3 | 80 | 7 | 25 | (%) | 0.17 | |||||||||
2010 | 0.34 | 6 | 86 | 3 | 0.03 | 1 | 8 | 19 | 1 (100%) | 1 | 0.17 | 0.15 | ||||
2011 | 0.41 | 2 | 88 | 9 | 23 | (%) | 0.2 | |||||||||
2012 | 0.45 | 1 | 89 | 8 | 18 | (%) | 0.21 | |||||||||
2013 | 0.5 | 5 | 94 | 3 | 0.03 | 3 | 17 | (%) | 0.2 | |||||||
2014 | 0.55 | 3 | 97 | 6 | 17 | (%) | 0.25 | |||||||||
2015 | 0.57 | 8 | 105 | 1 | 8 | 17 | (%) | 0.26 | ||||||||
2016 | 0.09 | 0.66 | 0.05 | 3 | 108 | 1 | 0.01 | 11 | 1 | 19 | 1 | (%) | 0.34 |
IF: | Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y |
AIF: | Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y |
IF5: | Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y |
DOC: | Number of documents published in year y |
CDO: | Cumulative number of documents published until year y |
CCU: | Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y |
CIF: | Cumulative impact factor |
CIT: | Number of citations to papers published in year y |
D2Y: | Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
C2Y: | Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
D5Y: | Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5 |
C5Y: | Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5 |
%SC: | Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
CiY: | Cites in year y to documents published in year y |
II: | Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents. |
AII: | Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y |
 
# | Year | Title | Cited |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2001 | The role of Japanese local governments in stabilisation policy. (2001). Robaschik, Frank ; Pascha, Werner . In: Duisburger Arbeitspapiere Ostasienwissenschaften. RePEc:zbw:udedao:402001. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
2 | 2015 | Diversity of firm sizes, complexity, and industry structure in the Chinese economy. (2015). Heinrich, Torsten ; Dai, Shuanping. In: Duisburger Arbeitspapiere Ostasienwissenschaften. RePEc:zbw:udedao:1072015. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
3 | 2010 | Anatomy of cluster development in China: The case of health biotech clusters. (2010). Conle, Marcus ; Taube, Markus . In: Duisburger Arbeitspapiere Ostasienwissenschaften. RePEc:zbw:udedao:842010. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
4 | 1999 | Aspects of private sector development in Vietnam. (1999). Kohl, Arno ; Lai, Tuong ; Heberer, Thomas ; Vinh, Nguyen Duc . In: Duisburger Arbeitspapiere Ostasienwissenschaften. RePEc:zbw:udedao:241999. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
5 | 1996 | Die japanische Familie der Gegenwart - Wandel und Beharrung aus demographischer Sicht. (1996). Lutzeler, Ralph . In: Duisburger Arbeitspapiere Ostasienwissenschaften. RePEc:zbw:udedao:71996. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
6 | 1999 | Das Problem der interkulturellen Kommunikation am Beispiel der Rezeption Deweys in China. (1999). Kim, Bong-Ki . In: Duisburger Arbeitspapiere Ostasienwissenschaften. RePEc:zbw:udedao:191999. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
7 | 2004 | The rise of temporary employment in Japan: Legalisation and expansion of a non-regular employment form. (2004). Imai, Jun . In: Duisburger Arbeitspapiere Ostasienwissenschaften. RePEc:zbw:udedao:622004. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
8 | 1997 | Der westliche Universalitätsanspruch aus nicht-westlicher Perspektive. (1997). Derichs, Claudia . In: Duisburger Arbeitspapiere Ostasienwissenschaften. RePEc:zbw:udedao:141997. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
9 | 2002 | Strategische Gruppen und Staatskapazität: Das Beispiel der Privatunternehmer in China. (2002). Heberer, Thomas . In: Duisburger Arbeitspapiere Ostasienwissenschaften. RePEc:zbw:udedao:462002. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
# | Year | Title | Cited |
---|
Year | Title | |
---|---|---|
2016 | The Narrow and the Broad Approach to Evolutionary Modeling in Economics. (2016). Heinrich, Torsten. In: MPRA Paper. RePEc:pra:mprapa:75797. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |
# | Series | Cites | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Duisburger Arbeitspapiere Ostasienwissenschaften / University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute of East Asian Studies IN-EAST | 1 |
Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.
Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.
CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated December, 1st 2017. Contact: CitEc Team