[Raw data] [50 most cited papers] [50 most relevant papers] [cites used to compute IF] [Recent citations ][Frequent citing series ] [more data in EconPapers] [trace new citations] [Missing citations? Add them now] [Incorrect content? Let us know]
IF | AIF | CIF | IF5 | DOC | CDO | CIT | NCI | CCU | D2Y | C2Y | D5Y | C5Y | SC | %SC | CiY | II | AII | |
1990 | 0 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | |||||
1991 | 0 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | |||||
1992 | 0 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | |||||
1993 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.05 | |||||
1994 | 0 | 0.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.06 | |||||
1995 | 0 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.08 | |||||
1996 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | |||||
1997 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | |||||
1998 | 0 | 0.27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.12 | |||||
1999 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.14 | |||||
2000 | 0 | 0.34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.15 | |||||
2001 | 0 | 0.36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.16 | |||||
2002 | 0 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
2003 | 0 | 0.41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | |||||
2004 | 0 | 0.46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
2005 | 0 | 0.47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.22 | |||||
2006 | 0 | 0.47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
2007 | 0 | 0.42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||||
2008 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
2009 | 0 | 0.44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
2010 | 0 | 0.44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | |||||
2011 | 0 | 0.46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
2012 | 0 | 0.47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||||
2013 | 0 | 0.53 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.22 | |||||
2014 | 0 | 0.55 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
2015 | 0 | 0.55 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 46 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
2016 | 0 | 0.56 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 72 | 3 | 0 | 34 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | |||||
2017 | 0.02 | 0.58 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 22 | 94 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 45 | 1 | 72 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0.21 | |
2018 | 0.04 | 0.7 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 29 | 123 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 48 | 2 | 94 | 2 | 3 | 75 | 0 | 0.28 | |
2019 | 0.02 | 0.88 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 21 | 144 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 51 | 1 | 111 | 2 | 2 | 50 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.33 |
IF: | Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y |
AIF: | Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y |
CIF: | Cumulative impact factor |
IF5: | Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y |
DOC: | Number of documents published in year y |
CDO: | Cumulative number of documents published until year y |
CIT: | Number of citations to papers published in year y |
NCI: | Number of citations in year y |
CCU: | Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y |
D2Y: | Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
C2Y: | Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
D5Y: | Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5 |
C5Y: | Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5 |
SC: | selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
%SC: | Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
CiY: | Cites in year y to documents published in year y |
II: | Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents. |
AII: | Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y |
# | Year | Title | Cited |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2015 | RESEARCH ON THE IMPACT OF THE INNOVATION POTENTIAL ON THECOMPETITIVENESS OF FURNITURE ENTERPRISES. (2015). Kyurova, Vyara. In: Entrepreneurship. RePEc:neo:epjour:v:3:y:2015:i:2:p:195-206. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
2 | 2016 | STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP IN THE TRAINEE ORGANIZATION. (2016). Filipova, Milena . In: Entrepreneurship. RePEc:neo:epjour:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:219-228. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
3 | 2019 | COMPETITION AND COMPETITIVENESS ââ¬â GENERAL THEORETICAL CONCEPTS. (2019). Logodashki, Nikolay. In: Entrepreneurship. RePEc:neo:epjour:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:16-24. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
4 | 2016 | INNOVATIVE POTENTIAL AS A FACTOR FOR INCREASING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF ENTERPRISES IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY. (2016). Timofeeva, Svetlana. In: Entrepreneurship. RePEc:neo:epjour:v:4:y:2016:i:1:p:144-165. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
5 | 2018 | RISK MANAGEMENT IN BANKING INDUSTRY. (2018). Stankovska, Aleksandra ; Stamevska, Elizabeta ; Dimitrieska, Savica. In: Entrepreneurship. RePEc:neo:epjour:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:229-236. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
6 | 2016 | THE DYNAMICS OF OUTSOURCING: A BIBLIOMETRIC STUDY. (2016). Nedelcheva, Yulia. In: Entrepreneurship. RePEc:neo:epjour:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:301-310. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
7 | 2013 | POSSIBILITIES FOR THE INCREASE OF COMPETITIVENESS OF A PRODUCT THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ACTIVE METHODS FOR DIRECT CONNECTION WITH THE CONSUMERS. (2013). Dimitrova, Raina. In: Entrepreneurship. RePEc:neo:epjour:v:1:y:2013:i:1&2:p:77-84. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
8 | 2016 | NEW FRAMEWORK OF BANKING SUPERVISION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. (2016). Nedelchev, Miroslav. In: Entrepreneurship. RePEc:neo:epjour:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:287-300. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
# | Year | Title | Cited |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2015 | RESEARCH ON THE IMPACT OF THE INNOVATION POTENTIAL ON THECOMPETITIVENESS OF FURNITURE ENTERPRISES. (2015). Kyurova, Vyara. In: Entrepreneurship. RePEc:neo:epjour:v:3:y:2015:i:2:p:195-206. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
Year | Title | |
---|---|---|
2019 | THEORIES OF EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION. (2019). Nedelchev, Miroslav. In: Economics and Management. RePEc:neo:journl:v:16:y:2019:i:1:p:10-18. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |
Year | Citing document |
---|