[Raw
data] [50 most cited papers]
[50 most relevant papers]
[cites used to compute IF]
[Recent
citations ][Frequent citing
series ] [more data in
EconPapers]
[
trace new citations] [Missing
citations? Add them now]
[Incorrect content? Let us
know]
| IF | AIF | CIF | IF5 | DOC | CDO | CIT | NCI | CCU | D2Y | C2Y | D5Y | C5Y | SC | %SC | CiY | II | AII | |
| 1990 | 0 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | |||||
| 1991 | 0 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | |||||
| 1992 | 0 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | |||||
| 1993 | 0 | 0.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.05 | |||||
| 1994 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.06 | |||||
| 1995 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.08 | |||||
| 1996 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | |||||
| 1997 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.09 | |||||
| 1998 | 0 | 0.26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.12 | |||||
| 1999 | 0 | 0.27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.13 | |||||
| 2000 | 0 | 0.32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.14 | |||||
| 2001 | 0 | 0.35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.15 | |||||
| 2002 | 0 | 0.37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||||
| 2003 | 0 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||||
| 2004 | 0 | 0.44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | |||||
| 2005 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
| 2006 | 0 | 0.46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | |||||
| 2007 | 0 | 0.42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | |||||
| 2008 | 0 | 0.44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | |||||
| 2009 | 0 | 0.43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
| 2010 | 0 | 0.43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | |||||
| 2011 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | |||||
| 2012 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||||
| 2013 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
| 2014 | 0 | 0.51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | |||||
| 2015 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||||
| 2016 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | |||||
| 2017 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | |||||
| 2018 | 0 | 0.54 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 83 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
| 2019 | 0 | 0.58 | 0 | 0 | 206 | 289 | 1 | 0 | 62 | 83 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
| 2020 | 0 | 0.75 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 64 | 353 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 240 | 1 | 289 | 2 | 1 | 50 | 0 | 0.29 |
| IF: | Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y |
| AIF: | Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y |
| CIF: | Cumulative impact factor |
| IF5: | Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y |
| DOC: | Number of documents published in year y |
| CDO: | Cumulative number of documents published until year y |
| CIT: | Number of citations to papers published in year y |
| NCI: | Number of citations in year y |
| CCU: | Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y |
| D2Y: | Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
| C2Y: | Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
| D5Y: | Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5 |
| C5Y: | Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5 |
| SC: | selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
| %SC: | Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
| CiY: | Cites in year y to documents published in year y |
| II: | Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents. |
| AII: | Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y |
| # | Year | Title | Cited |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | Employee Engagement and High Performance Work System: An Empirical Study. (2016). Rehman, Muhammad Zia-Ur ; Abbassi, Lubna ; Javaid, Yasmine Muhammad. In: Global Regional Review. RePEc:aaw:grrjrn:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:114-131. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
| 2 | 2019 | Current Trends and Issues in Quality Assurance Practices: Higher Education Pakistan. (2019). Ali, Muhammad Shabbir ; Arshad, Muhammad ; Rasool, Shafqat. In: Global Regional Review. RePEc:aaw:grrjrn:v:4:y:2019:i:3:p:250-257. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
| 3 | 2019 | Effective Management of Secondary School Head Teachers in Punjab: A Comparative Study. (2019). Ali, Muhammad Shabbir ; Arshad, Muhammad ; Rasool, Shafqat. In: Global Regional Review. RePEc:aaw:grrjrn:v:4:y:2019:i:3:p:136-144. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
| # | Year | Title | Cited |
|---|
| Year | Title | |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Secondary Schools Leadership: Promotee and Punjab Public Service Commission Selectee. (2020). Nawaz, Muhammad Hameed ; Arif, Muhammad. In: Global Regional Review. RePEc:aaw:grrjrn:v:5:y:2020:i:1:p:566-575. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |
| Year | Citing document |
|---|