[Raw data] [50 most cited papers] [50 most relevant papers] [cites used to compute IF] [Recent citations ][Frequent citing series ] [more data in EconPapers] [trace new citations] [Missing citations? Add them now] [Incorrect content? Let us know]
IF | AIF | CIF | IF5 | DOC | CDO | CIT | NCI | CCU | D2Y | C2Y | D5Y | C5Y | SC | %SC | CiY | II | AII | |
1990 | 0 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | |||||
1991 | 0 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | |||||
1992 | 0 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | |||||
1993 | 0 | 0.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.05 | |||||
1994 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.06 | |||||
1995 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.08 | |||||
1996 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | |||||
1997 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.09 | |||||
1998 | 0 | 0.26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.12 | |||||
1999 | 0 | 0.27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.13 | |||||
2000 | 0 | 0.32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.14 | |||||
2001 | 0 | 0.35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.15 | |||||
2002 | 0 | 0.37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||||
2003 | 0 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||||
2004 | 0 | 0.44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | |||||
2005 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
2006 | 0 | 0.46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | |||||
2007 | 0 | 0.42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | |||||
2008 | 0 | 0.44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | |||||
2009 | 0 | 0.43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
2010 | 0 | 0.43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | |||||
2011 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | |||||
2012 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||||
2013 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
2014 | 0 | 0.51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | |||||
2015 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||||
2016 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 71 | 101 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 30 | 1 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 0.18 | |
2017 | 0.01 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 30 | 131 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 101 | 1 | 101 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0.18 | |
2018 | 0.01 | 0.54 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 22 | 153 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 101 | 1 | 131 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0.21 | |
2019 | 0 | 0.58 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 180 | 0 | 4 | 52 | 153 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
2020 | 0.02 | 0.75 | 0 | 0.01 | 21 | 201 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 49 | 1 | 180 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0.29 |
IF: | Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y |
AIF: | Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y |
CIF: | Cumulative impact factor |
IF5: | Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y |
DOC: | Number of documents published in year y |
CDO: | Cumulative number of documents published until year y |
CIT: | Number of citations to papers published in year y |
NCI: | Number of citations in year y |
CCU: | Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y |
D2Y: | Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
C2Y: | Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
D5Y: | Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5 |
C5Y: | Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5 |
SC: | selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
%SC: | Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
CiY: | Cites in year y to documents published in year y |
II: | Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents. |
AII: | Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y |
# | Year | Title | Cited |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2015 | Approaches to Solve the Problem of Double-Counting Scientific Articles When Evaluating the Effectiveness of Scientific Organizations. (2015). Zolotarev, Dmitry. In: Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal. RePEc:akt:journl:v:10:y:2015:i:2:p:218-227. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
2 | 2018 | Monitoring and assessment of scientific performance: foreign experience and Russian practice. (2018). Doronina, Ekaterina ; Gusev, Aleksandr ; Malahov, Vadim ; Vershinin, Ivan. In: Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal. RePEc:akt:journl:v:13:y:2018:i:1:p:65-91. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
3 | 2016 | Measures to Improve Efficiency of Use of the Intellectual Capital of Russia: an Integrated Approach. (2016). Ushakova, Svetlana. In: Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal. RePEc:akt:journl:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:67-87. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
4 | 2016 | Russian Science in the Context of Cross-country Comparisons: Review of R&D Efficiency Statistics. (2016). Chechenkina, Tatyana. In: Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal. RePEc:akt:journl:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:125-141. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
5 | 2015 | Approaches to Solve the Problem of Double-Counting Scientific Articles When Evaluating the Effectiveness of Scientific Organizations: Roundtable Discussion. (2015). Zolotarev, Dmitry. In: Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal. RePEc:akt:journl:v:10:y:2015:i:2:p:228-242. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
# | Year | Title | Cited |
---|
Year | Title | |
---|---|---|
2020 | Modifications of the H-Index for Differentiated Assessment of the Results of Scientistsâ Creative Activity. (2020). Gerasimenko, Petr. In: Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal. RePEc:akt:journl:v:15:y:2020:i:1:p:55-71. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |